No.903
>>901Didn't test any formatting yet wait
Testtt (I'm drawing gay porn of 40yo men right now)~~test 2 blah blah~~
Let's see if it works, before I spoil nonnas when I'm discussing some ongoing series or something.
No.904
If I make a new random thoughts thread, will mods lock the old one? It’s over 500 posts and I think it’s autosaged now too.
No.906
Oh the fujo venting thread on /ffs/ needs to be locked so a new one can take its place.
No.929
Why is embedding videos from Nico Nico not supported?
No.934
Oekaki board I beg of you, adminjo.
No.941
Hello, I want to announce that the site will be going into maintenance by end of day today.
>>929>>934will look into those.
No.943
A 5 minute cool-off period is too long and makes the site dead. Why is it even here? What's the rationale behind 5 minutes? Makes 0 sense. It doesn't prevent spam, since spammers can simply post from a different VPN.
No.944
>>943It curbed the last few raids and most people aren't posting from a VPN but I agree, lowering it to 2-3 minutes seems reasonable.
No.947
>>943Man having to reupload a post multiple times because of a typo/text wrap not working makes the 5 minutes feel even more brutal. Now that we have the captcha I agree that the timer should be lowered to 1-3 minutes at the most.
No.957
I just saw it, but I'm pretty sure fujo venting 2 on /ffs/ needs to be locked.
No.967
There's now a politics-adjacent thread up.
BL is a hobby space. If I want to hear about irl politics, I will turn on the TV or go on social media.
I'm fine with politics-adjacent threads that are related to the distribution of BL, because that stuff is of interest to a BL audience.
But once the topic shifts from BL-adjacent, to the same kind of thing I literally go to this board to escape from, I feel it goes against the 'no politics' rule.
No.968
>>967Deleted the non-fandom related Russia talk. The thread itself is fine and can stay up.
No.1012
Anon posting Europa the last battle in the documentary thread feels like poltard trolling, I don't think that belongs on fujochan anyway lol
No.1029
>>943I also feel the same way. The cool-off period should only be 1 minute.
No.1030
please remove the cool down timer or only make it one minutes please please please
No.1031
>>1030What's so pressing you can't wait five minutes? Just read another thread or proofread your next post for a bit.
No.1032
>>1031This is the dumbest post in this entire thread.
No.1034
Echoing the request to lower the timer to 1-2 minutes. I usually check this site twice a day and reply to whatever thread got bumped, but now multiple threads get bumped when i check and its a pain having to wait for the timer to reply to each one. Please consider lowering it.
No.1035
>>1033I don't have dyslexia, so it doesn't take me 5 minutes to write 3 sentences. How do you envision people doing pic dumps with a 5 min wait between each upload?
>>1031 is the dumbest shit, because it's so patronising it makes me wanna hurl. Is this site a place for gradeschoolers or an image board for adults?
No.1036
>>1035Sorry, I wasn't thinking about image dumps. Usually I write posts that need to be split into multiple entries because they go on for too many paragraphs. The site wasn't generally used for dumping since it was slow and focused on long discussion, our culture was to make the most of every post and avoid confrontational language when debating by considering either viewpoint.
Now can you stop insulting me?
No.1037
>>1036>Usually I write posts that need to be split into multiple entries because they go on for too many paragraphs.NAYRT and I'm not trying to start a fight (this is my first post on the topic and I don't really care what they do with the timer), but out of curiosity, don't you ever get annoyed with the cooldown for that very reason? Sometimes, I write long posts, and I usually don't realize they need to be broken up into multiple parts until after I've typed the whole thing out, proofread it, hit "submit," and gotten the "post too long" message. Then, I feel rushed to get the second half of my post out there. Actually, I would think that would be an argument in favor of lowering the timer.
I do use a VPN to circumvent this issue, but I don't think I've ever spammed or done anything annoying, aside from excessively rambling about a couple of specific topics in their designated threads.>The site wasn't generally used for dumping since it was slow and focused on long discussionI do agree with this, though. One thing I really liked about this site when I found it was how much effort went into all the posts. I like how insightful other nonas are, even when I don't have much to contribute. I wish the board were a little faster, but only because I like reading what people have to say.
>>1028I am really worried about raids if they lower the timer, especially with the new traffic from 4chan.
No.1058
Can this site consider banning VPN posting for raid protection?
No.1059
>>1058We will take it into consideration as all IPs are logged under a cloak that neither admin can access for privacy reasons!
No.1092
Why is Fujochan blocked on my network? It was fine 3 days ago and since then I can't access it without a VPN.
No.1093
>>1092It's blocked by my isp too. I was able to add fujochan as an exception so I can browse with ease.
No.1094
>>1092I thought it was just a me issue but I'm having the same problem. Only a VPN or cellular on my phone works. I'm not good with tech at all
No.1095
>>1092i had this too for a while. i had to sign into my modem’s web interface (i think that’s what it’s called?) and turn off all of the preset “web safety” settings, and then it let fc through. alternatively you may be able to whitelist fc specifically as another nonna said.
No.1096
Anti-fujo cringe has hit bump limit and should be locked now btw.
No.1098
>>1093>>1094>>1095It's working for me now with no issues…
No.1108
>>1098same, dunno what happened
No.1109
i'm trying to post but it keeps saying my request looks automated, does anyone know what i should do?
No.1110
>>1109Reload the page and try again. If it's just a link and nothing else that might have also triggered it.
No.1144
I can't access the site without a VPN again…
No.1166
Hi, I'm so sorry if this is a dumb question, but when I report CP, it sometimes gives me an error. Do you all not receive those reports or are they going through on your end? Thanks!
No.1189
Would a captcha on posts help prevent bot spam?
No.1197
>>1189Bot spam yeah, but the ped0 link spammers are humans. They're for-hire and not SUPER persistent but they'll solve anything up to an including character/hobby based captchas, so long as it's google-able.
No.1198
>>1196One is about shipping seiyuu with each other, the other is just general seiyuu talk. They are not similar and the general seiyuu fandom might find the first one off-putting.
No.1199
>>1198It's a fujoshi site and one of the posts from the 2nd thread is about shipbait. No one will post female seiyuu unless they're talking about their shota voice.
No.1200
>>1199>No one will post female seiyuu It's the /ot/ board - it has a himejoshi thread
https://fujochan.org/ot/res/44.html, so nobody stops users from posting female seiyuu. Plus rps/rpf puts many people off - there is a reason why it's a separate board.
No.1205
>>1200Tbf there's still a few fujo content even on /ot/
I think the mods are too nice for even allowing a "himejoshi" thread.