No.10616
I just changed my country to the US in the settings on twitter and now I can see some nsfw tweets but not all of them, I still get that stupid message instead. Whatever man.
No.10617
I just made a typo that implied I liked pedo, zoo, and incest porn when I meant there's two different kinds of porn…FUUUUCK. I'm gonna get permabanned for that post I can feel it.
No.10619
>>10618I heard Discord is targeted by the new UK and EU laws right now but I haven't used it in years, I have no idea how these new rules are implemented. They're already badly implemented on twitter so I doubt discord is any better to be honest.
No.10620
>>10619Samefag and yeah it does but as far as I know, it's Discord asking for your ID or photo to verify you're an adult to see NSFW channels. That doesn't work because you can just get a picture of anyone on Google and say it's you, and also that doesn't stop predators from DMing kids cuz they usually hang around SFW servers.
No.10623
>>10588>that men are less ground in reality and get off to huge breasts and dickExactly, men's gay content is all just roided guys with huge penises that can be seen throu while clothed.
I've never see women draw men with their cocks visible from under the pants.
If anything women HUMANIZE characters too much, the humanization of fictional characters to the point of doing things like non-sharing yume or wanting rights for female characters over real women etc
It's the opposite problem.
No.10624
>>10622
To be fair male and female BL creators are equally capable of gooning out and drawing sexualised men. Examples are honeyqp and all the other female BL creators on DLsite, and also most of the KR webtoon artists. IIRC you have that visible cock under pants in chapter 1 of Jinx.
No.10627
>>10624NTA and OT but HoneyQP is a woman?
All the sex toys reviews(ones that are obviously intended for men) and futanari content made me believe the opposite but since I also saw djs of Free!, UtaPri and other franchises more popular with women I got confused.
No.10628
>>10624HoneyQP is a woman???
I thought their doujins were also a bit of a review/ad, there's photos of the wacko sex toys.
No.10629
>>10625Sorry i think i misread your post. If you meant that male and female creators depict sexualised male bodies differently (different emphasis and expression of erotic body features) then yes i agree with that. I assumed you were saying that women don't care visual erotics.
>>10627>>10628Ok now I'm doubting myself. I know she's (???) listed as female on mangaupdates and always publishing djs of very typical yaoi ships, the kind that you can just tell gay men don't dabble in so i've automatically accepted her being female. I've dismissed the ads as side hustle. But if they're indeed a man i might need to re-evaluate my assessment of their oeuvre…
No.10630
>>10629Bakaupdates probably isn't wrong, and I agree the ships/series they're drawing are very fujo.
I've been blindsided before by artists I assumed were men because they drew muscles or body hair only to see them posting selfies on their twitter clearly female. I still think there is a different "gaze" though, like even with more bara-adjacent art by women you don't see stuff like the "bear" body type all that often.
No.10631
>>10629I'm just surprised, I have less info than you. It's not impossible, I can believe it, but it is also pretty funny.
No.10633
>>10629I checked her/his website and twitter and I'm even more confused, if that's even possible kek.
Tbh, the franchise BL djs read as female for the most part. It's the original content(both BL and hentai) the one that makes me wonder. That and the onahole/vibrators ads lol.
Maybe she just likes drawing and selling all these comics/merch, who knows.
No.10634
>>10623Yeah I also see it in the opposite side of the art bodytype spectrum. I like twink/femboy/trap type of art because the guys are so cute but yesterday in one of the art discords I frequent someone posted a pink-haired catboy with a dick the size of his own torso and that just ruined the whole catboy.
No.10637
>>10630>Bara-adjacentNgl, I love bara-adjacent art as drawn by women. But yea, compared to real bara it ain't nearly as gross imo.
No.10638
>>10620It has to be a moving image that can follow the commands to open and close the mouth. Some video game footage works according to viral articles. What got me though is that
one NSFW channel got blocked for me, but all the others in other servers were fine, even the ones with age restriction applied.
Some users are reporting being banned completely from discord because the face scan thought they were under 13. Anyone wanna bet they're Asian women and it has issues with small, round face shapes?
No.10641
>>10639My farmer friend I met irl (we were both laughing at palestine x israel yaoi fanart because the place we tried to move our lolita meetup to had a bunch of protesters) has gone here a couple of times but she's not a regular user.
No.10642
>>10639Last year I went to Y/CON and met 2 nonas from here, it was a blast. I have one of them on Twitter and Discord but we haven't talked in a while. I wanna go this year so I'll see if we can see each other again.
No.10643
>>10639I suspect one of my mutuals may be an anon and she mentioned cons I used to visit so it could be possible. I also wouldn't be surprised if a former coworker of mine also knows these parts of the internet so I already know her irl. We have a manga store in my city I often go to with an extensive BL collection so I also assume most women who buy their books here are terminally online already, it's not impossible some of them use imageboards already.
No.10645
One of the weirdest things that I've witnessed while following artist accounts is that I remember an artist somewhere around 2018 that was drawing my OTP somewhat sporadically, pretty cute art, very typical fujo account really. Then somewhere in 2020, their account literally became nothing but a bot reposting japanese antivaxx news and japanese antivaxx propaganda, like having at least 2,000 RTs a day. They went from a very normal acc to almost a bot (And they weren't they'd still sometimes talk fujo stuff in the middle of antivaxx RTs) it was bizarre.
Another was an artist I very much liked and thought was normal ending up drawing big fat fucking scat out of nowhere (It's the artist that drew that infamous twst scat doujin) because you never expect a fujo to draw scat at all, let alone like it at all. Upon reading some of their tweets they'd say a lot that they wish they could be like men who draw scat porn and loli.
Anyway, sometimes I really think back on that. Nip fujos sometimes are weird
No.10647
>>10646kinda depressing we are regressing when it comes to the internet and freedom of speech. it should have never been normal to have kids online outside of kids websites with prewritten chat options.
No.10648
>>10645I saw that as well
No.10656
>>10651I'm obsessed with that Link fanart, holy shit he is so cute and lewd
No.10660
>>10654I skimmed this, it's literally about an unattractive otaku whose crush dates a jock, so he rapes the jock, blackmails him and then starts raping him some more, the big difference between that and a yaoi story is that the ugly protagonist and the author clearly despises men who are stronger and more attractive than him and this is their fantasy of revenge
>>10650reminded me of this
No.10661
>>10653You know it's a fujo franchise when Ebimo getting hired.
No.10662
>>10645>they wish they could be like men who draw scat porn and loli.I can kind of understand this logic. If I could just enjoy porn for porn's sake instead of having shipping autism I could eat like a king, you know?
>>10650I've seen this Freiza's blown out asshole before but I had no idea it was a whole comic. The fact that he's got enough interest to have a Patreon is craaaaaaazy.
No.10678
It fills me with joy to see yurifags seething about the lack of f/f fics because no matter how much they complain about it and harass fujos year after year, m/m still dominates.
No.10682
>>10678What's stopping them from making their own shit? So many writing tutorials exist online for them to learn, but nah, let's bully women for not making yurislop for us. I seriously can't fathom barging into fandoms spaces and leaving surprised you have to make shit you like if you wanna see more things you like?
No.10686
>Artist who draws/writes ship/character you like admits to never having consumed the canon
What's your reaction when this happens, or what would be your reaction?
No.10687
>>10686I would think it's weird but I wouldn't really care.
No.10688
>>10686Can't say I'm completely cool with it but I'd be more disappointed if there wasn't nice art.
No.10689
>>10686Depends? I feel like if it's a fanfic I'd notice the characterisation being off or just extremely bland and I would be annoyed with that beforehand. Then again, I very recently had a moment where a writer I generally enjoyed characterised a male character I like as a jealous otome chad and it took me completely off guard cause she did in fact play the game.
No.10690
>>10689 I don't know what it says about me that there have been at least 2 times where I really liked the characterization of someone who hadn't consumed the canon and felt it was close to mine. I wonder if it's because longtime fans might have gotten bogged down in fanon hell but secondaries would be looking at the wiki a lot.
But I ended up pettily blocking one of those people because they turned out to ship my NOTP and reached 99% likelihood of being an anti. I happened to find out about the not having consumed canon thing at the same time so it was just the cherry on top.
>jealous otome chadMy absolute least favorite type of OOC, especially for hyper-autist faves who I can never picture acting like some player fuckboy.
No.10691
>>10686I would say I'd block them and delete all their fanworks and pretend they don't exist and wipe all memory of them from my mind but then again I've met people who have actually consumed the canon with absolute dogshit takes, art and characterization so at least someone who DOESNT consume it could be course corrected in the long run